By Naeem Khan
For decades, the region of Kashmir has remained a central point of tension between India and Pakistan. But while both nations claim to stand for justice and peace in the area, many observers
and Kashmiri voices argue that the region is being used as a political tool-sacrificed repeatedly for
power, profit, and popularity.
Whenever either India or Pakistan faces internal unrest or declining public support, the Kashmir issue suddenly takes center stage. Critics say that both governments conveniently raise the Kashmir dispute to distract their citizens from pressing domestic problems like unemployment, corruption, inflation, and social unrest. In times of political crisis, the flags are waved high and the speeches grow fiery-but only to shift attention away from more serious internal issues.
Behind the scenes, India and Pakistan have often maintained back-channel communication and
quiet diplomacy. These hidden efforts, ironically, show moments of cooperation. One of the most telling examples is how both sides avoid major conflict along their international border. Instead of battles, soldiers are seen exchanging sweets and greetings on national holidays-a gesture that paints a very different picture from the headlines.
But while this show of diplomacy is staged, the people of Kashmir continue to suffer. Armed forces are deployed in large numbers, and draconian laws are used to suppress any form of dissent.
Nationalist voices are silenced, and those who call for constitutional or legal rights-either inside Kashmir or abroad-are often labeled as traitors.
For decades, the region of Kashmir has remained a central point of tension between India and Pakistan. But while both nations claim to stand for justice and peace in the area, many observers and Kashmiri voices argue that the region is being used as a political tool-sacrificed repeatedly for power, profit, and popularity.
Yet the international community continues to recognize Kashmir as an unresolved issue. The United Nations has passed several resolutions calling for a fair and impartial plebiscite-an official vote to decide the region’s future. These resolutions clearly state that the people of Kashmir have the right to self-determination and should not be forced to choose between India and Pakistan.
Furthermore, both nations are legally required to provide travel documents and basic freedoms to the people of Kashmir within their territories. However, in practice, these rights are denied or restricted.
In the end, Kashmir remains a pawn-traded, ignored, and misused by two powerful neighbors. Until the world takes a stronger stand and both India and Pakistan begin to honor their promises, the voices of Kashmir will continue to echo unanswered through the valleys and beyond.
