Pakistan Judges, Websites Banned, Internet Slowed: Digital Crackdown Deepens Free Speech Crisis

International

Pakistan has intensified its digital crackdown, blocking more than one million websites and online links in what authorities describe as a campaign against illegal and “objectionable” content, according to a new report issued by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA), according to The Express Tribune. The sweeping enforcement has disproportionately targeted major social media platforms and has reignited concerns over judicial credibility, press freedom, and the right to dissent in the country.

The PTA report reveals that Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and X were subjected to extensive monitoring. TikTok faced the harshest action, with 94 percent of flagged content blocked, while Facebook and Instagram saw nearly nine out of ten reviewed links taken down. In total, more than 1.4 million URLs were blocked, most under broad categories such as obscenity, morality, contempt of court, and content deemed harmful to state institutions.

Officials say much of the action was prompted by online criticism of judges from the superior judiciary. However, legal observers argue the crackdown coincides with a deeper institutional crisis following the controversial 26th Constitutional Amendment, which critics say has compromised judicial independence and entrenched executive influence over the courts. Allegations of corruption, selective justice, and political engineering within Pakistan’s judicial system have grown louder, even as public discussion of these issues is increasingly censored.

Beyond content restrictions, journalists and digital rights advocates report widespread slowing of internet services, intermittent platform outages, and aggressive surveillance. Independent reporters, opposition voices, and dissenting journalists have faced account suspensions, intimidation, and in some cases arrests, further shrinking the space for free expression. Public assemblies and online mobilization have also been curtailed, effectively stifling protest and political organization.

While the PTA frames its actions as necessary to maintain public order and morality, critics see a systematic effort to silence dissent, shield powerful institutions from scrutiny, and control the national narrative. As Pakistan’s digital landscape grows darker and slower, concerns mount that censorship, rather than accountability, has become the state’s preferred tool of governance.