A new wave of US tariffs proposed by President Donald Trump’s administration is drawing strong criticism around the world, as it targets imports from 60 countries over concerns about forced labour.
The plan would impose tariffs of 10% on countries such as the European Union, Canada, Mexico, and Pakistan, while higher duties of 12.5% would apply to nations including China, India, and Australia. US officials argue that these countries have not done enough to stop goods made under forced labour, putting American workers at a disadvantage.
However, many governments and experts are pushing back. Critics say the policy is too broad, grouping together countries with very different labour laws and enforcement systems. Some also question whether the move is truly about human rights or part of a wider effort to protect US industries.
The proposal follows a major legal setback earlier this year, when the US Supreme Court ruled that Trump had overstepped his authority in using emergency powers to impose tariffs. In response, the administration is now relying on a different legal tool Section 301 of the Trade Act to move forward.
The reaction from US allies and trade partners has been swift. The European Union called the tariffs unfair, pointing to its upcoming law banning forced labour products. China rejected the claims entirely, accusing Washington of politicising the issue. Australia also criticized the plan, warning it could harm both trade relations and American consumers.
Economists warn the tariffs could raise prices in the United States, especially for goods linked to global supply chains. Businesses may face higher costs, while markets particularly in Europe could feel fresh pressure at a time of slow growth.
Experts are also doubtful that tariffs alone can solve the problem of forced labour, which affects millions of people worldwide. Without global cooperation, they say, such measures may do little to address the root causes.
For now, the policy is still under review. But if approved, it could reshape global trade, strain key alliances, and deepen economic tensions at a time when the world is already facing uncertainty.
